BANKING & REAL ESTATE FRAUD
Forsberg v. The Land Court, Sun Trust, Harmon Law, Today Real Estate, CA 10-
Monday, May 16, 2011
Foreclosure Mills Exposed
Forsberg v. The Land Court, Sun Trust, Harmon Law, Today Real Estate, CA 10-
Brief
Mr. Forsberg alleges the defendants mentioned above to be guilty of: violating banking and S.E.C. rules and regulations; wire fraud; unethical conduct; Predatory Lending in banking fraud and deception in connection with Real Estate; criminal mischief and of operating a PONZI scheme all of which has cost Mr. Forsberg his estate’s rental income, undue pain and suffering as well as $14,850 in out of pocket expense to date, plus the cost of the estate in Hyannis which is valued at $325,000.
They have also violated The United States Constitution and his rights of due process. The defendants are further accused of working in collusion with one another in a racketeering scheme. Mr. Forsberg, a pro se litigant, seeks to recover monetary damages and enjoin Sun Trust Bank and OneWest Bank from foreclosing on properties.
Jurisdiction and Venue
This court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 22(a) of the Securities Act15 U.S.C.77 u(a) and Section 27 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78aa. Defendants have, directly and indirectly, made use of the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce, banks and/or the mails in connection with the misrepresentations and transactions described in this Complaint.
Venue lies in this Court pursuant to Section 22 (a) of the Securities Act 15 U.S.C. 77u (a) and Section 27 of the Exchange Act 15 U.S.C. 78aa, because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in the United States District Court of Massachusetts.
Defendants made material misstatements or omissions in connection with the purchase
of securities. Under banking rules and regulations of 33 and 34, a mortgage is a
T-
-
What Sun Trust Did Wrong
SunTrust offered a mortgage to me out of state by the means of Interstate Commerce
via a broker who they knew was not licensed in the state of Massachusetts. The bank
willingly and knowingly signed off on Top Dot’s mortgage (mortgage backed security).
When I filed and was granted bankruptcy protection, they collected on insurance,
declared it as a tax write-
Sun Trust is guilty of violating the Securities acts of 1933 and 1934, in addition to requesting /allowing Harmon Law and/or Today Real Estate to violate due process.
1. I was not served properly regarding the proposed sale of the family estate nor was I ever made aware of any proceeding/ruling/seizure/judgment/or hearing against me. I certainly was never notified by any court that I no longer owned the property in Hyannis, MA.
2. Defendant(s) fraudulently obtained rental income from plaintiff’s tenant, Courtney Johnson, by making misrepresentations, telling untrue statements, and material omissions regarding the truth of ownership, thereby depriving Mr. Forsberg of his deserved estate rental income.
3. I accuse them of converting or trying to convert (stolen) estate property, perjury
to the court, criminal mischief, wire fraud; breaking banking rules and regulations
and securities laws as well as aiding a PONZI scheme of Predatory Lending; deception
in connection with Real Estate -
4. John Julius and Doug Holt of Today Real Estate coerced Courtney Johnson (tenant) to pay rent to them (which she did for 5 months) by giving her false statements and misrepresentations of fact, in writing and in person.
5. I was offered a mortgage out of state by a broker who Sun Trust knew was not licensed in the state of Massachusetts.
6. Defendants violated The United States Constitution and my rights of due process.
-
Legal Complaint CA 10-